Write an essay of your choice based on the list of topics about the book “The Sunflower”. FYI 169Z: Forgiveness Paper Topics for the First Paper Write an essay of 750-1250 words on one of these topics 1. In The Sunflower, Josek tells Simon that he agrees with Simon’s choice not to forgive Karl, because “what he [Karl] has done to other people you are in no position to forgive.” (p. 65) Discuss one of these issues that might come up in thinking about Josek’s position: a. Does Josek’s consideration appropriately rule out forgiveness in this case? In discussing this issue, take into account the fact that Wiesenthal was a victim of the Holocaust, which Karl’s crime was part of. See what Wiesenthal says on p. 66 b. If Josek’s position is the right one to take, does this mean that God is not in a position to forgive harm done to other people? If this is an implication of Josek’s position, does this show that this position is not the right one to take? c. Does this mean that we should regard murder as an unforgivable crime, at least in this world, since the victim is no longer able to offer forgiveness? 2. The S.S. soldier Karl gunned down a family trying to escape from a burning building. This was part of a systematic campaign on the part of the S.S. that resulted in the murder over six million Jews. Does the severity of Karl’s wrongdoing make it unforgivable? What role should the severity of wrongdoing play in our decisions about when and whether to forgive? 3. Throughout “The Symposium” section of The Sunflower, the various authors who comment on Wiesenthal’s narrative make interesting claims and ask interesting questions. Evaluate one of these claims (Is this claim right? Is it mistaken? Why?) or take a stab at answering one of these questions. Here are some examples, though you should feel free to work with any example that generates interesting discussion on your part. a. Ozick asks, “Should not a Christian education make it impossible for a child to grow up to be an SS man?” (p. 213) b. Hertzberg claims, “The God who had allowed the Holocaust did not, and does not, have the standing to forgive the monsters who had carries out the murders.” (p. 168) 4. Explain and discuss a teaching or practice from a particular religious tradition regarding forgiveness or atonement or dealing with wrongdoing in general. 5. Several Christian writers express reticence about offering advice to Jews on the topic of forgiveness and the Holocaust. See, for instance, Marty on p. 210 or Hesburgh on p. 169. However, Wiesenthal asks, “Why is there no general law of guilt and expiation? Has every religion its own ethics, its own answers?” (p. 67) To what extent can or should members of different religions help each other answer questions about forgiveness? 6. Construct a topic of your own based on The Sunflower or on some issue that came up in our discussions in Lesson 2.

    The Sunflower

    Arbitration Topic from “The Sunflower”

    Arbitration is a course which builds neighborly associations betwixt specials. “The Sunflower” depicts the flushts revolving abquenched the Holocaust as haughtylighted by Simon Wiesenthal. The composer analyzes the proof he went through when imprisoned at the Nazi bivouacs. The romance depicts undivided of the solid challenges vulgar repeatedly proof in a homogeneity, and to some quantity, they repeatedly impress an absence to discontinue and overlook. Ce them, it is approximately inexpressible to exhibition cebearance and discontinue vulgar who bear dundivided misfortune-doing despite others. Arbitration comes in to extinguish the substance of single and communal differences. It is a hazardous course ce differing parties past it eliminates any show of concordant proofs occurring.

    Arbitration is established on discontinueness adventitious from expressive quenched misfortune-doing doings perpetrated. The romance of Wiesenthal haughtylights the difficulties vulgar proof admitting any misfortune-doingdoing to the other special. It eliminates any cetune to stipulate discontinueness. Ce copy, Wiesenthal had been enslaved to labor so a latter SS substance (Karl) who happened to be haunted by the crimes in which he had participated. The soldier sought to disclose every the misfortunes he had executeted aiming at obtaining a dissection from a Jewish substance. It was an vestibule towards acquiring discontinueness, referable attributable attributablewithstanding Wiesenthal did referable attributable attributable attributable comprehend what to do. He was accumulate betwixt condolence and integrity, and years succeeding he wonders if he did the direct invention or referable attributable attributable. No stuff the misfortunes vulgar execute in their lives, it is judicious to discontinue and reunite. It is incontrovertible the soldier, and the Jews had differences, and this was an turn ce the span groups to suit and better the loopholes.

    It is inherent estimateing each other with haughty revere and big consequence in the political enhancement. At intervals, vulgar repeatedly observe down and devalue each other attributable to several issues such as agreement in nefarious influenceivities. Despite the misfortune-doingdoings, husubstance living-souls should referable attributable attributable attributable sideline the substance of each referable attributable attributablewithstanding understand to compose the good-natured-natured and misfortune inventions. The atom of estimate each other as well-behaved living-souls guarantees arbitration past twain parties are inclined to discontinue. From the magnitude, Josek tells “I do referable attributable attributable attributable believe the God who created Jews is the selfselfcorresponding God who made the bivouac commandant, Wilhaus” (6). The announcement discloses differentiated brains towards span groups of vulgar. The Jewish and Nazis homogeneity deficiencyed to estimate each other with haughty revere past the posture is mitigated to project the arbitration course.

    Expressive the exactness enables an telling arbitration course. At the selfselfcorresponding interval, discontinueness is the principal trudge towards arbitration. If vulgar do referable attributable attributable attributable understand to discontinue, it becomes solidenedenedened ce them to reunite. In most facts, vulgar experiment it solidenedenedened to disclose the exactness past they are alarmed of substance judged. The Nazi soldier took the direct trudge and discloseed the exactness revereing the misfortunes he had executeted. He expected that Wiesenthal would discontinue him, referable attributable attributablewithstanding it was referable attributable attributable attributable the fact. Substancey vulgar regularly entreat if it is requisite and direct to discontinue repentant nefariouss irrespective of the misfortunes they bear executeted. Thus, expressive the exactness increases the cetunes of arbitration past each of the parties enlarge credit and a flatten of brains. “In his subscription, there was an side of penny repentance” (53). Thus, the exactness sets vulgar bountiful, and flush though they do referable attributable attributable attributable profit discontinueness at the interval, it eliminates the impressing of misfortune-doing-doing and having the other special judging you harshly. However, it is hazardous ce the parties complicated to reunite their differences through discontinueness.

    Ejection of devotional and amelioration differences creates an turn to profit arbitration efforts. In most aspects, devotional differences bear repeatedly diversified bitterness betwixt vulgar past they canreferable attributable liaise with a special from the other profession. The differences emanating from devotional variations in the romance of Wiesenthal expedites misfortunes to a biger quantity. The Jews and Christians depicted in the dissection of intellectuals and their responses. Ce copy, the “Christians are in civility of discontinueness opportunity the Jews impress that Wiesenthal made the direct excellent by referable attributable attributable attributable cegiving the latter soldier” (139). Their arguments eliminate a resistance betwixt Christian and Jewish populations. Therefore, such differences compel it solidenedenedened to reunite differing parties. However, it is a misfortune-doing vestibule past anybody could be in the misfortune-doing and deserves a avoid cetune no stuff the moment of the misfortunes executeted. It is hazardous to incite vulgar to do abroad with cultural and devotional differences which expedite issues rather than experimenting viable solutions.

    Conclusion

    The magnitude “Sunflower” has tellingly haughtylighted the issues of arbitration which is sharp ce the ejection of special and political differences. Karl opens up abquenched his crimes expecting discontinueness. However, Wiesenthal does referable attributable attributable attributable tell a account and decides to tramp abroad. Such a influenceuate depicts a aspect where undivided is haunted by the proof ce a crave interval attributable to the deficiency to influenceion to the wishes of a latter substance. The arbitration course starts where undivided verge haughtylights the several nefarious influenceivities affianced in opportunity the other special listens and accepts to discontinue. Therefore, brains to discourse the exactness sets vulgar bountiful, and the listener has to influence consistently. After every, husubstance living-souls are prundivided to compel mistakes hence the deficiency to afford avoid cetunes. The original intimation haughtylighted by the magnitude is arbitration.

    Works Cited

    Wiesenthal, Simon. The Sunflower: On the possibilities and limits of discontinueness. Schocken. (2008):1-289.