Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you: Examine at least (2) of the eras of policing and discuss their main strengths and weaknesses. Examine at least two (2) issues facing law enforcement today and explain the impact both of these issues have on social order. Take a position on where law enforcement is headed in the next five (5) years. Discuss what you believe the future of policing looks like, and the main challenges you think law enforcement will face. Describe the role of the public in cooperation with the police, as you see it, in the near future in order to improve the relationship between these groups and to optimally work together in facing the future challenges you identified. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Distinguish the relationship of criminal justice to social justice and the wider notion of equity and fairness. Summarize the mission of law enforcement in democratic societies and describe the structure of American policing today. Summarize the current ethical issues faced by criminal justice professionals and future of the criminal justice system. Use technology and information resources to research issues in criminal justice. Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using this rubric.


    The gregarious date marks the chief date in the fact of policing. The industrial vicissitude in the United States led to the literature of big cities that subsequently required some produce of policing. Police functionarys in this date represented the self-interests of politicians whom they served. Additionally, the courteous-bred employment was nonexistent, and the is-sue of managing police functionarys was placed on the politicians. Gone police functionarys usually patrolled the cities on pavement, police functionarys had good-natured-natured experiment of the communities they served. The matchless insight encircling the vulgar that lived in a detail tract-of-land gave the police paramount comprehension on practicable enormity that led to improved enormity restrain (Tilly, 2017).

    Some of the weaknesses of the gregarious date of policing were that police functionary served the concerns of the politicians. Their earliest goal was to gladden the gregarious guidece and thus solely rendezvoused on the enormitys that zealous the politician. This guide to large gaps in enormity restrain gone wrongs were suffer exempt if at complete the enormitys they committed did referable attributable attributable attributable concern the politician. Promotely, police functionarys had bottomless function pawn a development of the gregarious turnover. Lastly, the police operated below very haughty levels of preference and moneyless supervision that created gross opportunities guide rottenness (Tilly, 2017).

    The functional date of policing referableable the object of the gregarious determination of policing as the courteous-bred plan of governance did referable attributable attributable attributable suffer gregarious influences in the legitimacy of police functionarys. In the functional date, police functionarys became over rebellious and did referable attributable attributable attributable rely on the policies of gregarious guideers to perproduce their duties. One of the coercionces of the functional determination is homogeneity viewed the police functionary as a jurisdiction enforcer rather than a politician’s puppet. As a development, the power of policing extremely improved gone the police guidece was commissiony to the vulgar it served. The promote coercionce is that the police shifted their rendezvous to wrong confession and enormity restrain rather than rendezvousing on what the politicians wanted. Consequently developmenting in rectify jurisdiction enforcement (Braga, 2002).

    Although the functional date was the turning aim guide police, it did referable attributable attributable attributable follow extraneously some weaknesses. One of the weaknesses is that police functionarys no longer kinnovating the communities they served.  The homogeneity guarded police functionarys as a opposed amelioration which was the spring of the specialty “Us vs. them.” The discommission that developmented contributed to the manifestation of unreasonable guidece during protests and making arrests (Braga, 2002).

    One of the upshots that aspect jurisdiction enforcement in the innovating-fangled globe is anti-terrorism. Innovating-fangled modish terrorists are over dubious that requires a over dubious police guidece to barproduce with the menace. Thus, delayed methods of policing such as surveillance are certain. However, the sophistication of the police guidece has developmented in the exotericly-known investigation encircling the militarization of the police guidece (Schmalleger, Donaldson,  Kashiwahara, Koppal, Chase, Brown, & Marash, 2014).

    The promote upshot currently solemn jurisdiction enforcement is that there has been an growth in the wrong prosecution of police functionarys. Now police functionarys whose actions guide to impairment or expiration of sinless courteous-bredians are occupied to wrong prosecution. However, the brave arises on who is upright and who is referable attributable attributable. However, exotericly-known investigation has determined guide the increase of the power of policing to fix non-criminals are referable attributable attributable attributable caught in the verse of inspirer (Schmalleger et al. 2014).

    In the contiguous five years, jurisdiction enforcement is mitigated to experiment some trends love growthd manifestation of technology and tools love the collective resources, collectiveness cameras, robots, facial confession and GPS applications in enormity solving. Addditionaly, over rendezvous on homogeneity-oriented policing, over opportunities guide women in the jurisdiction enforcement, growthd cyberenormity menaces and empowering innovating progeny guideership roles. Currently, the jurisdiction enforcement is referable attributable attributable attributable courteous garnishped with technology to barproduce with cybercrime. The cyber menace earn perplex the earliest brave in coming jurisdiction enforcement (Bason, 2010).

    The exotericly-known and communities resemble a severe role in aidful the police earn chiefhand knowledge on enormitys and as-well maintaining calm, security and telling policing. The police and exotericly-known fitnesss patronage in enormity solving and managing other problems that the homogeneity is confrontment. This analogy is coercionceening by the exotericly-known commission with the police and as-well the exoteric avowal that the police deference the homogeneity avowals and amelioration when carrying quenched their actions. Police that manifestations procedural integrity and legitimacy are over mitigated to produce commission with the exotericly-known and maintenance with enormity restrain and elucidation. Recently, there enjoy been vaporous cases of police using a balballot of guidece to earn knowledge, and this has guideced the exotericly-known to reveal despite the police rudeness. When police manifestation unreasonable guidece on the citizens, then the commission among the two parties is weakened, and this guides to intelling prudence and collective wrong. In coming, the police demand to unite with the exotericly-known and debate the braves they are confrontment, be pellucid and pliant, curtail harm and rottenness, and be obvious in the homogeneity. These recommendations earn coercionceen the exotericly-known and police fitness. The jurisdiction enforcers should garnish themselves with large technology that earn aid barproduce with cyber-enormity menace and abrupt in coming (Bason, 2010).


    Bason, C. (2010). Leading exotericly-known sector innovation: Co-creating guide a rectify homogeneity. Prudence Press.

    Tilly, C. (2017). From mobilization to vicissitude. In Collective Violence, Contentious Politics, and Collective Change (pp. 71-91). Routledge.

    Braga, A. A. (2002). Problem-oriented policing and enormity prevention (p. 14). Monsey, NY: Wrong Integrity Press.

    Schmalleger, F., Donaldson, S., Kashiwahara, K., Koppal, T., Chase, S., Brown, A., … & Marash, D. (2014). Wrong integrity today. Prentice Hall.