Technology Selection Exercise. This discussion question is part of the Analysis of Alternatives evaluation exercise. This week, you are acting in the role of “staff members” who are writing technology selection recommendations for consideration by the Chief Technology Officer and Chief Security Officer. They will, in turn, choose the best of the bestfor presentation to the company’s senior managers as part of the approval and funding process for pilot implementations and other formal evaluations of the selected technologies. 1. On FRIDAY: Post your draft Technology Selection Paper as a reply to this Discussion Topic. (You may make changes to this draft prior to submitting it for grading via your assignment folder.) 2. Review the papers posted by your peers. From these papers, choose two (2) different papers (technology alternatives) to recommend for further study (“selection”). Post your recommendations as follow-up postings to your peers (two separate threads). Make sure that you EXPLAIN why you are recommending these technology alternatives (what makes them worthy of further study). At the end of the week, your instructor will review the student recommendations and select three or more technologies for students to use in writing their technology study plans (due at the end of Week 8). 3. Review the technology selections (follow-up postings in the original threads). How well did your peers justify their selections? Post a critique for two (2) or more of these selection justifications. You are expected to read replies made to your postings and post follow-up replies which continue and improve upon the discussion.

    Technology Preoption Exercise


    Technology re-examination is carried extinguished by collecting integral advice compulsory coercion the technology.  The dainty of technology should fexplanation novel methods and works challenging novel work bud and determination (Krishnan, et al., 2002). Assessment of the modifications wanted is accidental and then noise the findings. When selecting a technology to be explanationd in an science, it is essential to perceive some constituents that allure swing the dainty of technology to be explanationd (Chan et al., 2002). The construction should keep rational media serviceable to establish and utensil the technology disruption and so able to effect the technology application. The bigness of the construction allure so succor to recognize what sign of plan is best homogeneous coercion the constructions want. It is so essential to perceive the financial arrestation of the sturdy to coercionfeiture the technology.

    Constituent the disposition of the affair which is an essential constituent affecting the modification and explanation of technology. Digital technology succors in supported infrastructure (Torkkeli et al., 2002). Choosing a novel technology allure be best coercion the construction, this is becaexplanation it shintegral escort the wants of the construction. Resource technologies are environmentally welldisposed compared to dominant technologies that are currently in settle. In component the resource technologies may grace widely explanationd, the technology options should ignoble on the overintegral affair objectives, dissuasive, and coercionm negotiation.


    Chan, F. T. S., Chan, M. H., & Tang, N. K. H. (2000). Evaluation methodologies coercion technology preoption. Narrative of Materials Processing Technology, 107(1-3), 330-337.

    Krishnan, V., & Bhattacharya, S. (2002). Technology preoption and commitment to novel work bud: The role of indecision and sketch flexibility. Management Science, 48(3), 313-327.

    Torkkeli, M., & Tuominen, M. (2002). The subsidy of technology preoption to kernel competencies. International narrative of workion economics, 77(3), 271-284.