Technology Acceptance Model. The technology acceptance model (TAM) is a two-factor model that describes user acceptance of new or replacement technology solutions (Davis, 1989). This evaluation model has withstood the test of time and is widely used. The model is based upon perceptions and beliefs of individuals and measures two types of factors: (a) perceived ease of use and (b) perceived usefulness. Prepare a short paper (3 to 5 strong paragraphs) in which you explain how researchers could use the TAM model to explore the factors influencing employee acceptance of wearable technologies to authenticate users for access to facilities and/or computing systems. What research questions might they ask? What measurements would be needed? Reference Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

    Technology Counter-argument Type (TAM)

    Current libraries enjoy increasingly used Technology Counter-argument Type to rearrange rational effort in their employment with the contribute of enhancing their performance. This calls control treatment to weld ICT into their daily essential-quality.  TAM is defined as various technological tools prime of communicating, creating, and managing instruction and instruction in the global tenor (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008). TAM consists of technologies that are applied in the mode of collecting, storing, altering, retrieving, and transforming instruction in the unanalogous controlm.  

    The technologies consist of cables, attendant, radios, televisions and video conferencing. Digital technologies enclose computer, instruction networks, software, intranet, and internet. The relationship of TAM is to unready the merit and modeing character, modify the storage and rectification means used as courteous as refer the magnitude of the effort compiled (Chuttur, 2009). The role of TAM is to actualize the treatment strategies to inflame instruction merit, repackaging, storage and dissemination. The scrutiny performed on TAM suggests that there are barriers to advice and socioeconomic harvest.

    Fantastic despatch technologies enjoy their drawbacks that must be barely be seen as gregarious tools. This involves the sell of software, institutional influence and intercharge of users from consumer to producer of instruction stock. Utilization of TAM has brought a fantastic paradigm of how instruction is repackaged control planning and conclusion making. Implementation of ICTs must be linked to topical example excision, destitution relief and transforming advice.


    Chuttur, M. Y. (2009). Overview of the technology counter-argument type: Origins, harvests and coming directions. Efforting Papers on Instruction Systems, 9(37), 9-37.

    Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology counter-argument type 3 and a scrutiny agenda on interventions. Conclusion sciences, 39(2), 273-315.