Part 1: Division
Shape: The division of the events can be illustrative as nature exact skewed past it shows to accept a longer bottom on the exact margin than on the left margin. This can as-well be observed from the event the events shows to accept a main moderation (44.7) that the median (42.5). This arises from the event that the senile-antique epoch are hither compared to the immature Oscars.
Center: Most of the men-folks are the intermediate epochs (30-35) as compared to the epochs of other participants. 28% of the participants are at this epoch concatenate.
There are 8 bins in the histogram
From the overhead diagram, most of the Oscars are among the epochs of 35 – 40 years which accounts control 33% of the aggregate Oscars. The actors show to hsenile-antique the lowest compute of Oscars at the epochs of 65-75 years.
As biblical by the histogram, shows that the events concatenate is among 30 and 80, giving the overwhole concatenate to be almost 55. A closer seem at the events shows that the epoch of the employees who accept acquired the Oscars varies a doom.
From the overhead diagram, winners epochd overhead 75 exhibits an stdispose peculiarity. There quenchedliers mope on the period 75-80.
A compendious analysis of the division overhead shows that the controlemost compute of Oscar accords control Best Actors among the years 1970 and 2001 were accorded to intermediate-time-honored actors. The epoch division was exact-skewed as shown where actors epochd among 35 and 40 acquired the most accords 10 quenched of 33 (33%). The epoch of the winners concatenated from abquenched 30 to abquenched 80, where 5 quenched of the 32 were epochd among 60 and 80. The overwhole division concatenate was abquenched 55. The variability was brought by the quenchedliers who were epochd among 75 and 80 when they acquired the Oscars.
Part 2: Descriptive Statistics
A breakdown of the similar is as shown in the table below:
To obtain the quartiles, the events is disconnected into indecent similar portions. In this circumstance, the events comprises of 32 entries.
32 ÷ 4 = 8
Each quartile contains 8 entries.
The Q1= 37, Q2 = 42, Q3= 48.
Therefore, the five-compute analysis is.
Min: 31, Q1: 37, Q2: 42, Q3: 48, Max: 76.
Concatenate = Largest value- Minimum value
The intermediate 50 percent concatenate among 37 and 48