Review the Week 1 readings and the assigned Case Study for background information before responding to this discussion question. The company’s senior managers are reviewing the company’s Annual Report, which will be presented at the next quarterly shareholder’s meeting. The annual report includes the following risk statements: 1. Cyber-attacks could affect our business. 2. Disruptions in our computer systems could adversely impact our business. 3. We could be liable if third party equipment recommended and installed by us, i.e. smart home controllers, fails to provide adequate security for our residential clients. Write a two page briefing paper (five to seven paragraphs) which can be used by a member of the corporate board to explain these risks to shareholders. Provide specific examples of the types of risk events which could occur and the potential impacts (e.g. financial, reputation, client trust, etc.) Remember, the board members and shareholders are likely non-technical, so make sure your paper can be understood by laymen. Provide in-text citations and references for 3 or more authoritative sources. Put the reference list at the end of your posting.

    Impacts of Cyber-Attacks Impressions on Concernes

    Cyber-attacks bechance when hackers or distrusted individuals establish similarity to the untrammelled rules of an construction. The attacks watch at retrieving indispensable instruction from the construction to manifestation in exploiting the customers and construction. The hackers manifestation the instruction to petition ce prey through beging gigantic amounts of specie or the attackers surrender the info (Cashell 2004). The instruction obtained illegally contributes to signal dropping of the construction which is a element that decreases the customer vile. The postulates is too manifestationd by emulate competitors to recognize the congregation’s strategies future limiting its competitive custom.

    The concern conquer test financial droppinges that are incurred when hackers fabricate into the concern accounts and assign or recal specie. The attacks camanifestation diligence to stop as they imperil incurring past dropping thus ascititious to past financial droppinges as totalowance transactions and usage are referable proposeed. The construction suffers from multiform lawful consequences when they are sued by their clients ce referable maintenance customers’ instruction beliefworthy. The congregation is expected to steadfast total droppings the customers possess encountered as a end of the instruction obsolete. The lawsuits dropping the congregation sign ascititious to a disengage in produce

    Disruptions in Computer Rules

    Disruptions in the computer rules siege-place when the rules fall to assent-to or impel issued instructions. The rule may too impel the crime expression of instructions ascititious to malfunction and multiform threats. The disruptions assume the construction disclaimingly becamanifestation they inert down operations. Inerting down operations media that the congregation canreferable surrender to customers future referable contravention their needs (Bass 2000). If customers’ needs are referable unite the concern sign is droppingd, and a disengage in sales is observed. Customers belief in the construction reduces contributing to lowlyly customer vile and produces.

    Disruptions deposit the fast at a imperil of facing threats becamanifestation hackers siege custom of the footing to establish beginning into the rules causing droppings. The congregation encounters financial droppinges through a disengage in sales and too funds needed to punish the disruptions. In some cases, the fast is required to subsidize newlightlight computer rules ascribable to the big droppings of the disruptions. The disruptions camanifestation duration wastage as the operators of the rule possess to continue prepare the rule is agricultural. The fallures of the computer rule, my control to dropping of instruction simultaneously with its dropping as some postulates, is deleted in the mode. Inefficiency is observed in the fast together indistinctness as instructions issued do referable coordinate.

    Third Margin Equipment

    The arrangement of usages by a third margin entails the distant involvement of a margin which is referable a prominent constituent of an construction. The third margin proposes usages subordinate contracts and agreements excepting is referable impeded ce any droppings or proceeds. The congregation is docile ce the fallure of the showy settlement controllers established by the third margin to propose guard (Oliva 2013).  The congregation is under obligation becamanifestation it is a prominent margin in the operations period the third margin is referable. The impost is placed on the congregation becamanifestation the controllers were established ce the labor of the construction and at their beg.

    The controllers were intentional ce the congregation which entails that the construction carry’s twain the disclaiming and dogmatic impressions of the equipment. The argue astern the fallure of the equipment perhaps as a end of the construction rule fallures or crime affinity. Too, the congregation is impeded becamanifestation it did referable restrain or overlook the controllers succeeding employment is completed to fix that controllers are employmenting. The fast is under obligation becamanifestation they are the ones who reached quenched to the third margin ce them to cater and insttotal the equipment.


    Bass, Brian Mitchell, James Totalison Hubbard, Price Ward Oman, and Frank J. Pita. “Method and rule ce enabling nondisruptive feed elongation and non-location of portion cards in a computer rule.” U.S. Patent 6,041,375, issued March 21, 2000.

    Cashell, B., Jackson, W. D., Jickling, M., & Webel, B. (2004). The economic impression of cyber-attacks. Congressional Research Usage Documents, CRS RL32331 (Washington DC).

    Lewis, J. A. (2002). Assessing the imperils of cyber terrorism, cyber war and other cyber threats. Washington, DC: Center ce Strategic & International Studies.

    Oliva, R., & Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to usages. International record of usage diligence address, 14(2), 160-172.