Paper B1: a matrix mapping of a key IT-related organizational (or personal) ethical issue concerning privacy. This assignment gives you an opportunity to analyze a key IT-related organizational (or personal, if not in the job force) ethical issue, related to privacy subject to relevant laws, regulations, and policies. Both of the following sites provide sources, and an excellent backdrop for issues relating to privacy protection and the law. See EPIC Privacy Issues at: See List on left and/or: EFF Privacy at [see list in center on this page]. This includes sub-topics discussing information privacy, privacy laws, applications and court rulings (case law is usually an extension of the basic law based on the facts from specific cases and real-world court decisions), and key privacy and anonymity issues. While the sites provide many interesting topics, be sure to focus on our class IT topics. Use the template below and the list of suggested workforce privacy topics from one of the sites above to produce a matrix to map a key organizational ethical (or personal, if not in the job force) issue and how this issue is affected by laws, regulations, and policies. Use the list of normative ethics principles below to help you complete the matrix. Choose any three (only three) of the following list of twelve (12) principles of normative ethics described below. Prepare the Ethical Issue matrix and include the following explanation (200 words) —double-space your narrative—below the matrix: Why I chose the dilemma; Why I chose the three principles; and An analysis of the research used to identify the actions in the matrix. The completed matrix allows you to weigh the different issues involved and assign a rank as to the importance of the actions based on the effect on the stakeholders. Submit the matrix for grading to the LEO Assignments Module. Indicate appropriate APA in-text and source citations for all sources. In addition to critical thinking and analysis skills, your assignment should reflect appropriate grammar and spelling, good organization, and proper business-writing style. This assignment is directly related to Paper-B2. The ethical issue identified in this assignment will be used in your Paper B2 Assignment. Paper B2 asks you to write a policy that corrects the ethical issue described in Paper B1. Normative Ethics List Autonomy: is the duty to maximize the individual’s right to make his or her own decisions. Beneficence: is the duty to do good both individually and for all. Confidentiality: is the duty to respect privacy of information and action. Equality: is the duty to view all people as moral equals. Finality: is the duty to take action that may override the demands of law, religion, and social customs. Justice: is the duty to treat all fairly, distributing the risks and benefits equally. Non-maleficence: is the duty to cause no harm, both individually and for all. Understanding/Tolerance: is the duty to understand and to accept another viewpoint if reason dictates doing so is warranted. Publicity: is the duty to take actions based on ethical standards that must be known and recognized by all who are involved. Respect for persons: is the duty to honor others, their rights, and their responsibilities. Showing respect others implies that we do not treat them as a mere means to our end. Universality: is the duty to take actions that hold for everyone, regardless of time, place, or people involved. This concept is similar to the Categorical Imperative. Veracity: is the duty to tell the truth. A sample template for the matrix is shown below. To reconstruct the sample template, you may use the Table Tool in MS Word or copy and paste this template. Ethical issue: Stakeholders (Principle 1) (Principle 2) (Principle 3) 1 2 3 4 Step 1: Identify the ethical issue that you want to analyze, as described above. An example might be the falsification of your personal profile in a social networking site. Step 2: Identify the stakeholders involved. You, someone who reads your personal profile in a social network site, potential employers, etc. Be sure that each stakeholder category is unique and not similar to another category you use. Step 3: Choose any three (only three) of the principles that might apply to your issue such as autonomy, publicity, and veracity. Step 4: identify how the ethical issue affects each stakeholder based on the principles you identified. Put this statement in the matrix next to the stakeholder. Sample Completed Matrix Ethical issue: falsifying your profile on a social networking site Stakeholders autonomy publicity veracity 1: Yourself You have the duty to maximize the right to make your own decisions. You have the duty to take actions based on ethical standards that must be known and recognized by all who are involved. You have the duty to tell the truth 2: Other users of the networking site They have the duty to make their own decisions They make these decisions based on ethical standards that should be recognized by the person falsifying their profile They assume that the person falsifying the profile has the duty to tell the truth. 3: The social networking site The autonomy of the site is limited by law (Goldman, 2007) Users of social networking sites are content publishers, as such the site must take actions based on legal and ethical standards and must notify users of these standards so they are known by all. As providers of content the site must conform to the laws regarding truth or be held responsible for legal issues as defamation (making harmful false statements about someone else) or copyright infringement. (Goldman, 2007) Reference: Goldman, E. (2007, May). Social Networking Sites and the Law. Retrieved from

    Retreat and Ethics

    Religions issue: honor coercion specials
    Peculiar calling to referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable impress in such a cem that may endanger other crowd to allow retreat divulsion.Calling to be unspotted to others and to consensus every special and correspondent opening.Calling to beentertain rationally in sentence making and establish possess sentences
    Other conservationrs on the political networkConsidering the impimpress of unreligions deportment on other conservationrs on the political networkMaking sentences naturalized on conservationful religions standards recognizable by a line distemper on the network.Each conservationr must establish an stubborn sentence whether to impress religionsly online or referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable.
    The political networking siteProvide facilities to aid autonomy and retreatFix availability of sustainable referableification systems vindicateion.Aid retreat and kindred issues through teaching and as per the conditions of the decree (Goldman et al. 2007)



    The overhead matrix provides an partition of the religions cunning interventions that can be conservationd to livelihood and fix the tenet of honor coercion other crowd environing political network retreat is adhered to. These tenets fix that crowd observe succeeding each other’s good-fortune online and cebear from exposing each other’s private referableification. The measures enthralled by the authorities may be interfering, though normal such as eaves-dropping a suspect’s dialogue or bugging their specialal computer. These sentences may be seen as an breaking of retreat, still the religions sentences compromised may establish them viable. In most times than referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable these sentences entertain no direct legislations persuasive them, still uniformly they are independent, they beseem lawful lead.

    The vindicateion interventions as presented in the matrix should be coercionmulated by those sentences that prioritize retreat on the web. A stewardship pattern should be adopted by the apt federal authorities to vindicate the interests of the weak groups such as the political network conservationrs time promoting temper extraneously undermining the need coercion making specialally advised sentences (Duncan et al. 2015). All cunning sentences ostensibly conservation political, environmental and biological concerns which coercionm a reason coercion an religions evaluation that can be that would be livelihooded by the impression of the punish religions tools.


    Goldman, P. Y., & Landsman, R. A. (2007). U.S. Patent No. 7,290,033. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

    Duncan, B., & Whittington, M. (2015, November). The consequence of equitable mass coercion a outrival vindicateion effrontery pattern. In Outrival Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on (pp. 517-522). IEEE.