M7D1: The Medical Interview Module 7 We’ve all been to the doctor’s, but most of us never really watch what the physicians do during the medical interview. To help you become more keenly aware of the stages of a medical interview, we’re going to watch a short segment of a medical interview. This case allows you to apply the basic concepts of the medical interview to an actual patient interview. As a way to apply what you learned in Chapter 13, participate in a class discussion by posting answers to the following questions: How would you characterize the interaction between the physician and the patient in the video? Would you consider this a good interaction? Why or why not? Based on what you saw, what parts of the SOAP note were covered? Were any missing? Was this physician effective in her interviewing skills? Why or why not? Reply to two of your peers, discussing whether you agree or disagree with their posted viewpoints. Explain and justify your responses by referring to the concepts and vocabulary you’ve learned from reading the text and watching the lectures. Evaluation Criteria Your initial post should be at least 250 words and must substantively integrate the assigned readings from the module with proper APA style formatting. For assistance with APA style formatting, visit the Library or the Excelsior OWL. Your initial post is due by Thursday at 11:59 PM EST. Your responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 PM EST. After you have posted, read through the postings of your peers. Choose (at least) two of your peers’ posts to respond to. The posts you choose to respond to do not necessarily have to be classmates’ initial posts. Each response to a peer should be (at least) approximately 100 words in length and should contribute to the discussion in progress. All responses to classmates should be substantive. That is, they should go beyond simple agreement or disagreement with classmates’ posts. Also, be sure that your responses are respectful, substantive, and consistent with the expectations for discussion, as stated by the prompt. Be sure to monitor and respond to feedback to your major thread post throughout the module. Be sure also to reply to your classmates’ postings and that your responses are within the designated due dates for this discussion activity. Please direct any questions you may have to your instructor. See the Course Calendar for due dates for posts and responses. Consult the Discussion Posting Guidefor information about writing your discussion posts. Be sure to check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors before you post it. When you are ready to post, click on the “Create Thread” button for a new thread or “Reply” to respond to a previous post. Then, copy/paste the text from your document into the message field, and click “Submit”. Discussions are worth 25% of your final grade and are assessed using the SLA Discussion Rubric. Review the rubric carefully so you understand how you will be graded. Rubrics can be found within the Start Here – Course Information area.

    M7D1: The Medical Interview

    The interaction between the physician and the resigned was very welcoming and excited. This is accordingly the physician made the resigned arrive-at snug and very interactive restraint it was referefficient a one-method dialogue. The physician was desirefficient of appealing to the resigned in a good-natured-natured method and made him arrive-at facile in a method that he was efficient to public up and bestow biased details that some seemed to be indivisible (Jerant, et al., 2017). This is a complete interaction between the two fellow-creatures restraint twain the physician and the resigned were efficient to attain what they wanted. The resigned was to-boot controltunate at the purpose that he was efficient to acquire some of the things he did referefficient recognize environing medication.

    In the SOAP referablee, the controlthcoming was practised. The call and time of source of the resigned. The deduce restraint the resigned’s scrutinize to the clinic, details environing the resigneds’ gist, the unconcealed arrive-ating of the resigned’s bloom, whether the resigned is on any medication, the physician was efficient to trace environing the resigned fact environing smoking and whether he intends on quitting the practice. The physician was efficient to discuss the resigned region, dignity hurry and pulse rate which she indicated it in the referablee (Seo, et al., 2016). Basically, referablehing was left quenched of the referablee. The interviewer was telling in her interviewing skills accordingly she was efficient to attain the equitpotent answers quenched of the resigned. She was efficient to pledge the resigned and public up environing his practices. The interviewer was very accommodating that made the resigned be at quiet with her thus making the interaction to be fortunate.


    Jerant, A., Hanson, B., Kravitz, R. L., Tancredi, D. J., Hanes, E., Grewal, S., … & Franks, P. (2017). Detecting the effects of physician trailing in self-care interviewing skills: Coding of standardized resigned (SP) scrutinize recordings versus SP post-scrutinize ratings. Resigned teaching and counseling, 100(2), 367-371.

    Seo, J. H., Kong, H. H., Im, S. J., Roh, H., Kim, D. K., Bae, H. O., & Oh, Y. R. (2016). A steer con-over on the evaluation of medical learner documentation: duty of SOAP referablees. Korean record of medical teaching, 28(2), 237.