M6A1: Short Paper – Deterrence and Mutually Assured Destruction Effective arms control agreements are not generated by one nation’s willingness to make one-sided sacrifices; they are the product of the realization that all parties would gain from them. Nations enter into arms agreements because they have good reason to fear the consequences of unshackled military power. For many years the Soviet Union and the U.S. engaged in an ever-escalating arms race involving the constant development of more innovative and powerful nuclear weapons. The Nonproliferation Treaty helped to slow down this escalation and put in place an agreement that helped to deter those nations without nuclear weapons from developing them. Military historians, career servicemen, and laymen have pondered why, with all of this capability, neither of these powers has initiated an attack (first-strike). Is this the result of the policy of mutually assured distraction (MAD)? After reading the module notes and all supplemental materials, respond to following: Illustrate the concept of mutually assured destruction (MAD) and describe its role as a deterrent in the prevention of first-strike attacks. Discuss the morality of the MAD concept. Given the current state of world military affairs, discuss whether this policy can continue to be the cornerstone of our military policy. Are there any alternatives other than the forging of effective arms control treaties? Support your position using appropriate sources that are properly cited. Your paper should be 1-2 pages in length (not including title and reference pages). It must be formatted according to APA standards [PDF, File Size 131 KB], 6th edition, including title and reference pages. Writing Help Want some help with your writing? Smarthinking is a free service for Excelsior students. Smarthinking’s Online Writing Lab paper review service will provide you with a detailed, personalized critique of any written assignment. Smarthinking even has a technical writing specialty! If you are going to use this excellent resource, keep in mind that this service is asynchronous and requires some turn-around time to provide feedback on your paper. The earlier you submit your paper, the better! You will be required to use your Blackboard log-in information to access Smarthinking. Short papers in total account for 20% of your grade. Review the SBT Research Paper Rubric by clicking on the “View Rubric” button at the top of this page, or by going to the “Start Here-Course Information” section of the course to see more information on grading criteria. Compose your work using a word processor (or other software as appropriate) and save it frequently to your computer. Be sure to check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors before you upload it. When you are ready to submit your work, click “Browse My Computer” and find your file. Once you have located your file, click “Open” and, if successful, the file name will appear under the Attached files heading. Scroll to the bottom of the page and click “Submit.”

    M6A1: Short Paper – Deterrence and Interchangeablely Assured Damnations

    Student’s Name


    M6A1: Short Paper – Deterrence and Interchangeablely Assured Damnations

    The Concept of Interchangeablely Assured Damnation (MAD)

    The concept of Interchangeablely Assured Damnation (MAD) is a creed utilized in the soldierly conceptualization of diplomacy comprising of the exoteric confidence system whereby brace agencys or past may be compromised in a full-scale nuclear implement assault across each other. The collision of such an vestibule to soldierly diplomacy would culminate into the damnation of twain or total the parties compromised in a MAD manage twain the assaulters and the advocate (Eller, 1967). Nsingle of the participating parties would be certain from the others strain to ruin them using an resembling managece. Manage specimen, in the event of the US and the Russian nuclear agency and the promote of using across single another is single of the superfluous causes of emotion that guarantees interchangeable damnation to either the provocative cainterpretation or the advocate.

    The Role of MAD as a Deterrent in the Prevention of Highest-Lower Assaults

    The concept of the MAD asserting the deterrence role is the earliest centre of the creature of the creed in the highest fix. As an adversary managece is anticipating the interpretation of nuclear implement across the other, there is the sympathy of the contrarysecurity or the contrary-value of a concordant agency constitution utilized by the other cainterpretation (Gärtner, 2014). The assumptions culminate into the deed that twain sides possess resembling or concordant nuclear agency capabilities. Hence, the highest-lower assault begs the doubt the reaction of the assaulted cause. In change, this causes the deterrence conceptualization as there are no guarantees of what to look-for in provisions of contrarysecurity or repayment.

    Therefore, this helps to practise senior agencys at recess and contrary-checking each other in the interpretation of nuclear implements to lower highest on the other. The MAD revolves encircling the deterrence plea practiseing twain parties curbed to the precincts of their agencys extraneously using it across the other, as there can be an resembling, past, or concordant contrarysecurity causing resembling or past damnation.  

    The Uprightness of the MAD Concept

    The uprightness of the MAD concept is contradicting in constitution and very involved to strain a concord subject-matter. On the single laborer, the influence of using the nuclear implements and ruining everything, as well-mannered-mannered as, abundant deaths, it is analogously injustice. Full stop! On the other laborer, the pledge of a contrary value is the lawful change to aid in practiseing at recess the foul cainterpretation from thinking of the possibility of using the nuclear or implements of majority damnation (Hashmi & Lee, 2004). Thus, it analogous to fix the concept of MAD is kept in obstruct by twain parties. The doubt of the interchangeable damnation causes a deterrence of causing any misfortune in the cosmos-people. Therefore, asserting the uprightness of the collision of the MAD concept.

    As abundant countries remain to action their soldierly capabilities in provisions of nuclear implements, the cosmos-people remains to be laagered to a expressive denunciation of majority damnation. As such nations love North Korea, China, Iran, Pakistan, India, inchoate the managemer nuclear agency kingdom shape past nuclear faculty susceptibility and expertise, the MAD concept stands at the room of constitution unnecessary (Gaertner, 2014). At this subject-matter, any agency can adopt to overlook the MAD creed once they amajority past nuclear implements as they dumbfounder a expressive denunciation to the other. Therefore, the MAD cannot remain to be the cornerstsingle of the soldierly system. However, it is calm?} weighty as helps to practise nations in obstruct of using nuclear implements in the promote of constitution contrary by other agencys. Thus, serving as the best opinion to promise manage and deterrence to interpretation the implements.


    Eller, V. (1967). The Mad Uprightness: An Expose. The Christian Century84(52), 1647-1649.

    Gaertner, H. (2014). North Korea, deterrence, and promise. Defense & Confidence Analysis30(4), 336-345.

    Gärtner, H. (2014). Deterrence, disarmament and promise manage. Interexoteric Politics51(6), 750-762.

    Hashmi, S. H., & Lee, S. P. (Eds.). (2004). Ethics and Implements of Majority Damnation: Religious and Secular Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.