M5D1: Affectionate Communication is Good For You Module 5 Kory Floyd and Sarah Riforgiate are concerned about affection. In a 2008 article in the academic journal Communication Monographs, Floyd and Riforgiate argue that “ affectionate communication evolved among humans because it contributes to physical safety and well-being.” In a recent article in Communication Currents, the two summed up their findings. Begin by reading the article, “Affectionate Communication Is Good for You.” Also from Chapter 10, recall that you read about 25 different affinity-seeking strategies. Participate in a class discussion by posting answers to the following questions, drawing on Floyd and Riforgiate’s work and the material from Chapter 10: Do you feel that affectionate exchange plays a role in relationships other than romantic relationships? Let’s say you are starting a new job. If you were trying to get your boss to like you, which affinity seeking strategy would you use and why? Thinking back to your own relationships, which of the 25 strategies have you used? What factors determined the strategy or strategies that you chose? Which strategy or strategies were most successful? Why do you think they were successful? Reply to two of your peers, discussing whether you agree or disagree with their posted viewpoints. Explain and justify your responses by referring to the concepts and vocabulary you’ve learned from reading the text and watching the lectures. Evaluation Criteria Your initial post should be at least 250 words and must substantively integrate the assigned readings from the module with proper APA style formatting. For assistance with APA style formatting, visit the Library or the Excelsior OWL. Your initial post is due by Thursday at 11:59 PM EST. Your responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 PM EST. After you have posted, read through the postings of your peers. Choose (at least) two of your peers’ posts to respond to. The posts you choose to respond to do not necessarily have to be classmates’ initial posts. Each response to a peer should be (at least) approximately 100 words in length and should contribute to the discussion in progress. All responses to classmates should be substantive. That is, they should go beyond simple agreement or disagreement with classmates’ posts. Also, be sure that your responses are respectful, substantive, and consistent with the expectations for discussion, as stated by the prompt. Be sure to monitor and respond to feedback to your major thread post throughout the module. Be sure also to reply to your classmates’ postings and that your responses are within the designated due dates for this discussion activity. Please direct any questions you may have to your instructor. See the Course Calendar for due dates for posts and responses. Consult the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. Be sure to check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors before you post it. When you are ready to post, click on the “Create Thread” button for a new thread or “Reply” to respond to a previous post. Then, copy/paste the text from your document into the message field, and click “Submit”. Discussions are worth 25% of your final grade and are assessed using the SLA Discussion Rubric. Review the rubric carefully so you understand how you will be graded. Rubrics can be found within the Start Here – Course Information area.

    M5D1: Genial Message is Good control You

    It is indispensable to allot genial change in message as it is speaking in elevating enjoyment, rest political kindred, enjoyment intangible heartiness, political revere, as courteous as, fostering a heartinessy kindredhip. I waste it is ocean to feel genial message in kindredhips as it plays a discriminating role in developing and hopeful confidence inchoate colleagues referable solely in sentimoral kindredhips. According to Bell (2014), genial message has a abstruse role in kindredhips as it assists in illuminating intangible and corporeal heartinessy that accelerations to adhere-to community rest and concomitantly. Similarly, Floyd et al., (2014) argues that genial message in kindredhips enhances proficiency of contentment, corporeal courteous-being, and indisputable intangible heartiness.

    Further, in examine to obtain my odd boss to love me, I would economize the dynamism temporization to affirm my posture and productivity in the toil. This is accordingly, substance dynamic entails substance a whole solver, supposititious, and innovative in my toil (Gordon & Hartman, 2009). In spin, this would acceleration me to be referableified and convince my boss that I am courteous-acquainted with my toil and am very productivity control the appreciate adduction I feel in the toilplace.

    Moreover, in my kindredhips I would pronounce to feel economized inclusion of others, swing perceptions of restness, honesty, optimism, and supportiveness (Mallin & Seilheimer, 2015). The ocean factors influencing the strategies I allot in my kindredhips is the crave to understand community restr in heartinessy kindredhip. In spin, they can toil concomitantly towards a beggarly scope that is easier approaching from a unified face than individually. The most happy strategies were honesty and optimism. It is manifest that hopeful transparency accelerations to controlge a zealous kindredhip that oceantains coming optimism of substance glutinous.


    Bell, R. (2014). The Effect of Genial Message on Relational Restness in the Emerging Adult Sibling Kindredhip.

    Floyd, K., Hesse, C., Boren, J. P., & Veksler, A. E. (2014). Genial message can smother immunity: Trait love predicts antibodies to occult Epstein-Barr poison. Southern Message Journal79(1), 2-13.

    Gordon, J., & Hartman, R. L. (2009). Affinity-seeking strategies and known message in peer toilplace kindredhips. Atlantic Journal of Message17(3), 115-125.

    Mallin, I., & Seilheimer, A. (2015). Affinity Understandking Strategies: At the Crossroads of Better Message and Appreciative Advising.