In Scene 2, a new sales rep discusses the company’s off-label marketing strategy with a veteran sales rep. Is it unethical or illegal for a sales rep to represent that he is a doctor when he has a doctorate degree in chemistry but is not actually a physician? (Support your answer to this question.) When the new sales rep suggests that they talk with the corporation’s legal or human resources department about the drug’s safety for off-label uses, how does the woman respond? Does her response encourage ethical conduct? Why or why not? Please write at least 2-3 paragraphs. thank you

    In show 2: Medical represntatives should referable portion-out their off-label management with anoyone else, owing others can easily copy their management and invert the similar. Being a position holder in chemistry the individual shouldreferable portray him as a physician. It in unreligions owing he authority keep scholarship about the pharma result still may referable keep any scholarship on knowledge of human body.

    Women tally about religions constituent is absoulteley significant.Offlabel canreferable be justified with any kind of corporations juridical concern. In religions deal-in pharma posse is responsible to create their result ingredient, dosperiod period facto etc on personal medical referablees and that as-well on standerdised carriage. Unreligions usperiod of drugs and communicateing should be avoided. Religions conduct should be in the amelioration of any pharma organisation and that should mirror in the complete result communicate management.