Ce processor InnovatingP1 and compiler A:
Ce processor InnovatingP1 and compiler A:
no of counsels/core=2250
CPI=1.5
Cycle interval=1/3.4*109 = 294.12 ps(pico seconds)
CPU interval=(estimate of counsels)*(cycles per counsel)*(cycle interval)=2250*1.5*294.12=992.65 ns(nano seconds)
Ce processor InnovatingP2 and compiler A:
no of counsels/core=625
CPI=3.2
Cycle interval=1/2.6*109 = 384.62 ps(pico seconds)
CPU interval=(estimate of counsels)*(cycles per counsel)*(cycle interval)=625*3.2*384.62=769.23 ns(nano seconds)
Ce processor InnovatingP1 and compiler B:
no of counsels/core=1750
CPI=1.8
Cycle interval=1/3.4*109 = 294.12 ps(pico seconds)
CPU interval=(estimate of counsels)*(cycles per counsel)*(cycle interval)=1750*1.8*294.12=926.47 ns(nano seconds)
Ce processor InnovatingP2 and compiler B:
no of counsels/core=500
CPI=5.0
Cycle interval=1/2.6*109 = 384.62 ps(pico seconds)
CPU interval=(estimate of counsels)*(cycles per counsel)*(cycle interval)=500*5.0*384.62=961.53 ns(nano seconds)
Of full the associations Processor InnovatingP2 and compiler A has moderate CPU interval so this association is the best which accept ameliorate deed.
Using the metric (Cycles/s)*Cores/(Dollars2 )
NewP1: ((3.4 × 109 ) ∗ 4 )/ 1702 = 4.71 × 105 cycles*centre seconds*dollars2
NewP2: ((2.6 × 109 ) ∗ 4 )/ 1702 = 3.60 × 105 cycles*centre seconds*dollars2
Using this metric, NewP1 has the prominent treasure. However, this metric is referable very authenticationful becaauthentication the deed quantity(in 1st question) aloft shows that the NewP2 can ooze programs faster with the corresponding estimate of centres and require. It is referable speaking of a cheerful computer ce its cost.