Control trapezoid and Simpson ways, the numerical integration have not-absolute fallacy
where is the numerical end using intervals between [0, 1].
(i) Explain the power-principle scaling with an representative 1.5 (instead of 2 and 4 as expected control the trapezoid and Simpson’s way, respectively).
(ii) How can undivided diplomatize this bearing and refresh the desired fallacy scaling ?
power principle scaling:
power principle scaling is a scaling with a continuous which simpliy
multiplies the originalpower principle kindred with a
control trapeziod ERROR SCALING