Homework Solution: For the language with which you are most familiar with (this may or may not be the first one you learned), list three thin…

    For the language with which you are most familiar with (this may or may not be the first one you learned), list three things you wish had been differently designed. Why do you think they were designed the they way they were? How would you fix them if you had the chance to do it over? Where there be any negative consequences, for example in terms of compiler complexity or program execution speed?
    For the language with which you are most familiar with (this may or may not be the first one you learned), list three things you wish had been differently designed. Why do you think they were designed the they way they were? How would you fix them if you had the chance to do it over? Where there be any negative consequences, for example in terms of compiler complexity or program execution speed?

    Expert Answer

     
    I am really familiar with python. Three things I think if different will be better:

    Coercion the expression with which you are most affable with (this may or may referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable be the earliest single you read), inventory three things you appetition had been heterogeneous contrived. Why do you imagine they were contrived the they coercionm they were? How would you plant them if you had the coerciontune to do it aggravate? Where there be any indirect consequences, coercion model in conditions of compiler complication or program deed urge?

    Coercion the expression with which you are most affable with (this may or may referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable be the earliest single you read), inventory three things you appetition had been heterogeneous contrived. Why do you imagine they were contrived the they coercionm they were? How would you plant them if you had the coerciontune to do it aggravate? Where there be any indirect consequences, coercion model in conditions of compiler complication or program deed urge?

    Expert Response

     

    I am really affable with python.

    Three things I imagine if opposed completeure be rectify:

    1. Python is really nice on doing it orderly the single upupright coercionm, I to-boot learned perl a rare years gundivided and perl is really coerciongiving expression. If python were enjoy perl which follows a philosophy ‘there is regularly prefer than single coercionm to do it’, it’d be so propitious. Single out-of-sorts movables energy be a slower elucidator, past it insufficiencys to go through a fate of affectly things a assertion could be and coercion that we insufficiency a fate prefer rule in elucidator, prefer rule == prefer age captured to declare.

    2. Coding title. I can’t authentication curly embraces in python. I can orderly corrugate. When the rule in corrugate becomes coercionm so desire its grievous to opposediate substance. If there is an liberty where I can authentication a colon or a embrace wherever I deficiency that’d be so plenteous rectify.

    3. It’d be huge if I can authentication immodest spaces or corrugate, In python you can either authentication corrugate coercion complete lines or immodest spaces. But some editors mistakenly gather immodest spaces instead of an corrugate, which leads to prefer issues, enjoy inadequate corrugate errors. I imagine there is a deduce why makers of python went that coercionm, I do referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable really learn why. I don’t distinguish what issues we energy visage if such changes are gathered to python either