Consider the smallest single precision floating point number, 2-149. What will happen the “gap” at that number if you change the type to double precision? DO NOT discuss the smallest double precision number – just the largest single precision represented as a double type.
Homework Solution: Consider the smallest single precision floating point number, 2-149. What will happen the “gap” at that numb…
Consider the lowest unmarried exactness unformed sharp-end calculate, 2-149. What procure betide the “gap” at that calculate if you qualify the stamp to envelop exactness? DO NOT debate the lowest envelop exactness calculate – harmonious the largest unmarried exactness represented as a envelop stamp.
Expert Counter-argument
