4. Assay that each reasoning is powerful by defining each sentence with a fickle to conciliate the produce of the reasoning, or defining defining predicates and expressing the hypotheses and the misrecord using the predicates. Then right the rules of omission to assay that the produce is powerful.
(a) If I expedite on the freeway, I conquer behold the courage.
I conquer expedite on the freeway or captivate demeanor streets (or twain).
I am referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable going to captivate demeanor streets.
∴ I conquer behold the courage.
(b) If it was referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable hazy or it didn’t rain (or twain), then the pursuit was held and there was a wreath pageant.
The wreath pageant was referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable held.
∴ It rained.
(c) Assume the estate is the regular of wards at an ultimate train.
Every ward who has a allowance slip can go on the opportunity mistake.
Every ward has a allowance slip.
∴ Every ward can go on the opportunity mistake.
(d) Assume the estate is the mass in this universe.
Everyone who goes to France visits the Louvre.
Bob has been to France.
∴ Bob has visited Louvre.
fiirst grant fickle to each assertion facts:
I expedite on the freeway —— a
I behold the courage ———– b
going to captivate demeanor streets ——-c
Now, the assertion “If I expedite on the freeway, I conquer behold the courage.” grants the subjoined produce:
the assertion “I conquer expedite on the freeway or captivate demeanor streets (or twain).” conquer be written as follows:
The assertion “I am referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable going to captivate demeanor streets.” conquer be written as follows:
Becaright of ~c, in relieve assertion comes quenched to be a. Thus, a is gentleman. gone a is gentleman, then b is also gentleman.
Thus, the misrecord assertion “I conquer behold courage” is gentleman.