Findings between Variables. Each student must use the dataset that will is provided (located in Module 3 Writing Assignment folder) and write a brief 1 page summary of the findings between at least two variables. Specifically, using the appropriate techniques discussed during the semester (i.e., use the correct analysis technique based on the level of data) and discuss if the correlation between the two chosen variables is significant (analyze five different two variable relationships). Also, discuss hypothetical (educated guesses) reasons for said findings whether significant or not. To the point, you must identify groups of at least two different variables and assess at least five relationships/trends from the selected variables and discuss any potential reasons for the relationships. Note these do not have to be the actual reasons, I simply want you to critically think about and discuss what could be causing the correlations. The assignment must be typed with 12 point Times New Roman font, 1 inch margins, and Double Spaced. You choose five groups of two variables each and analyze them. Specifically, you should use the appropriate techniques we have learned throughout the semester and determine if correlation exists between each of the five groups. Then give an educated guess as to why each correlation exists or not. I hope this helps. Example for Writing Assignment All, Here is an example discussion of a relationship for your writing assignment (NOTE: you cannot use this same relationship in your paper): “The boat was more likely to sink following a crash if the captain had traveled at least 60 miles. This is possibly due to exhaustion; more specifically, the more mileage results in longer trips which allows for less rest and recovery. It seems that a tired captain is more likely to make a catastrophic error compared to a well rested captain. Further, the longer trips suggests deeper more treacherous water which are much harder to navigate safely. As a result, those individuals that are farther out will have longer response times by the Coast Guard or responsible agencies. A longer response time results in more damage to the boat which would increase the likelihood of sinking.” You will need to expand on each of your relationships, but use this as a guideline to follow. Question 0 percent 33-65 percent 66-90 percent 91-100 percent Name Did not attempt. X X Included name. Identified Trends Did not attempt. Identified 1-2 relationships. Identified 3-4 relationships. Identified 5 or more relationships. Discussion Did not attempt. Did not discuss potential reasons for identified trends. Either briefly discussed trends with little to no detail, the reasoning was not logical or did not discuss all five relationships. Discussed all five relationships with logical potential reasons for the trend and used detail. Format Did not attempt. Did not follow any of the formatting guidelines. Followed font, spacing and margin formatting, but did not meet the page requirements (too short or too long). Followed font, spacing and margin formatting, and proposal met the page limit. Grammar and Spelling Did not attempt. A great number of grammatical and spelling errors (20+). Less than 20 errors but more than 10. Less than 10 grammatical and spelling errors.

    Boat Clash Statistics

    The boat clash statistics provides separate statistical relations which own a referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributableiceable sagacity. Separate kindreds can be symmetrical to aid in determining whether a boat achieve clash or referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable. In this plight, the elder convergence achieve be analyzing the contrariant variables supposing to fir whether there exists a interdependence. The five groups symmetrical include: (1) Conjuncture that the fall was captured and whether the boat sank or referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable; (2) Years of Trailing and whether the boat sank or referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable; (3) If leader was married or referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable and whether the boat sank or referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable; (4) Century of Leader and Removal Excursioned; and (5) Gender of Leader and Removal Excursioned.

    Following conducting a Spearman’s rho on the conjuncture the fall was captured and whether the boat sank or referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable, the Spearman’s rho treasure was 0.75 indicating a powerful kindred among on whether a boat would subside inveterate on the conjuncture the fall was captured. An educated suppose would be that a fall captured in summer would own proveior chances of the boat subsideing than the undivided captured during decay. Similarly, following conducting a Spearman’s rho on years of trailing and whether the boat sank or referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable. A incompact kindred was symmetrical with r = 0.36 and p = 0.11 implying a incompact relevance among the brace. Following testing the Pearson’s interdependence among leader’s matrimonial standing and whether the boat sank or referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable, the axioms reveals that there exists a very incompact kindred among matrimonial standing and boat subsideing or referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable (Coakes and Steed 120).

    Following conducting a Pearson’s interdependence, the treasures denote that the gender of leader has a incompact kindred with removal excursioned. As Coakes and Steed not attributable attributableify, undivided could prove that removal excursioned is referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable inveterate on gender except the point of excursion and space the fall was captured (122). Following conducting a Pearson Interdependence, the Pearson interdependence treasure control Century of Leader and Removal Excursioned was 0.258 and a p treasure of 0.70. The treasures denote that there exists a incompact kindred among century of leader and removal excursioned. Undivided can prove that the removal excursioned is principally decided by the point of the fall or some other element rather than the century of the leader.

    Works Cited

    Coakes, S. J and L Steed. SPSS: Analysis outside agony using SPSS rendering 14.0 control Windows. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009.