Discussion 1: Research Philosophies/Methodologies It is crucial for you, as an independent scholar, to understand the differences between two major research philosophies (also referred to as research methodologies), quantitative and qualitative research. The selection of a research method (quantitative or qualitative) is critical to writing many components of your Doctoral Study. Quantitative research is associated with a positivist research philosophy. Positivist (quantitative) researchers employ a “deductive” approach, requiring them to identify and use an existing theory to test hypotheses after collecting quantitative data. On the other side of the spectrum, qualitative research is associated with an interpretive research philosophy, with data collection serving to explore a phenomenon through the constructed meanings of the participants. The ultimate decision of methodology is based upon a critical review of the literature on a specific topic and research question. To prepare for this Discussion, review Chapters 4 and 5 in Saunders, Lewis, and Thornhill (2015), and consider how the different research philosophies can influence choice in research methodologies, as well as how these choices can impact a doctoral research study. By Day 3 Post an analysis of the relationship between your personal research philosophy and quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Your analysis should include the following: Identify the key concepts, propositions, precepts, etc., of your personal research philosophy, including any rationale for your choice. Analyze the relationship between your research philosophy and the chosen research methodology for your Doctoral Study. Analyze how the choice of methodology can impact a Doctoral Study, as well as influence later research decisions and results. Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and at least one additional scholarly source. Refer to the Week 1 Discussion 1 Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.

    Pragmatism Inquiry Philosophy/Methodology


    Essentially, Inquiry Philosophy assigns to the reliance environing the diversified ways in which basis respecting a undoubtful interrogativeness needs to be unmoved, analyzed and following utilized. Therefore it deals with the source, regularity, and enlargement of acquaintance. In the circumlocution, to discourse inquiry philosophies, inquiryers should be informed of coercionmulating their confess reliances and assumptions. All stages of the inquiry government in most cases are established on assumptions which rendezvous on the sources and the matchless regularity of acquaintance. A inquiry philosophy frequently is a reflecting of the author’s requisite assumptions which afford the basis coercion the diplomacy rightd in inquiry. There are lewd dignified images of inquiry philosophies which are Pragmatism, Positivism, Realism, and Interpretivism.

    Key Concepts, Sentences, Precepts of Pragmatism Philosophy

    Pragmatism, in being, assigns to the accurate motion which embraces scholars who pretension that a detail sentence or ideology works satisfactorily if it is gentleman. Therefore, it media that a detail ideology or sentence is current if it is rightful and exceptional if unpractical. It sourceated from the United States in the 19th period. Apart from philosophers, it has besides influenced others fields such as advice, enactment, sociology, and politics. Pragmatism as a promise was initially rightd in the printed coercionm to assign to a accurate light a period past by William James. The pragmatic saying which is a government rightd in classifying hypotheses fluctuation by ascertaining their rightful consequences was the centre of pragmatism (Saunders, & Lewis, 2012).  It is valued that the most masterful pragmatist saying collision was on the ideology of faithfulness in the works of twain Peirce and James. In the 1970s, share in Pragmatists’ writings disseminate widely and its ideas controlmal coercion making extensive contributions and increase to philosophy.

    Inquiry Philosophy and Chosen Inquiry Philosophy

    In pragmatism inquiry philosophy the most dignified determinant of inquiry philosophy is the inquiry topic. It is feasible to meet pragmatics combining Interpretivism and positivist among undivided inquiry depending on the inquiry topic. Unlike other inquiry philosophies, this philosophy is supple sufficient to incorporate over than undivided diplomacy and inquiry approaches in the identical consider. Besides, it is comfortable to mix multiple methods of inquiry in studies with this inquiry philosophy which embrace regulative, cece and vital methods. Nevertheless, do referable necessarily keep to right condensed methods yet verge to right a alliance of approaches which rectify the detail inquiry in the best carriage (Anderson, & Shattuck, 2012). Most topics of circumlocution descend below positivism and Interpretivism philosophies.  Most are the times when it becomes requisite to alter accurate assumptions and growth to a odd composition. These qualified assumptions are usually available by accustomed pragmatic inquiryers who value that there are divers matchless ways of belowtaking inquiry as polite as interpreting the cosmos-people. Therefore, they value that there is no undivided detail aim of light that can represent the entire represent since there sway be multiple realities (Collis, & Hussey, 2013).

    Impact Choice of Methodology

    A mixture of regulative and vital inquiry methodologies determines that evaluation of basis is rectifyd (Creswell, & Creswell, 2017). Such a alliance determines that limitations of undivided basis image are enslaved and bought to normality by the cece compensated by another. It besides allows inquiryers to precisely authenticate undoubtful aspects of phenomena by approaching it from vantage aims which are opposed as polite as using a multiformity of methods and techniques. Therefore, it determines rectifyd belowstanding in the consider through integrating diversified ways of sagacious. It is dignified to drawing preceding to how to incorporate these two methodologies to determine the consummation of the consider.



    Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-established inquiry: A decade of growth in advice inquiry? Educational Inquiryer, 41(1), 16-25.

    Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2013). Trade inquiry: A rightful train coercion belowgraduate and postgraduate students. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Inquiry design: Regulative, vital, and modified methods approach. Sage publications.

    Saunders, M. N., & Lewis, P. (2012). Researching trade & management: An requisite train to drawingning your project. Pearson.