Assignment 2: CRUD – Defining Information Ownership One easy way to determine information ownership is to think of CRUD—create, read, update, and delete. If you cannot only read but also create, update, and/or delete information, then in some way you own that information because you are responsible for its quality. Here again, let’s consider your school as an example and focus on your personal and transcript information. That information includes your student ID, name, address, phone number, GPA, declared major, declared minor (if you have one), and courses completed (your transcript). Part 1: Identify Create, Update, and Delete Privileges For each piece of information, first identify who has create, update, and delete privileges. Include any individuals or departments that have these sorts of information privileges. There may be several. If so, who is ultimately responsible for your personal and transcript information? Second, identify all the groups of people at your school who can only view (read) your information. Part 2: Develop a CRUD Matrix Develop a CRUD matrix that outlines the relationships among the pieces of information and user privileges (example: http://ocean.otr.usm.edu/~w300778/is-doctor/pubpdf/sc2008.pdf). Part 3: Write a Detail Document Write a detail document about the various business rules that define how the scenario described in Part 1 works with respect to information ownership and their relationships. Identify the appropriate relationships among the information, and define the minimum and maximum privileges associated with each relationship. Your paper must be a minimum of two pages, double-spaced and comply with CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. You may want to review the assignment criteria found in the Rubric.

    CRUD – Defining Instruction Ownership

    Name:

    Instructor:

    Institution:

    Date:

    Part A: Identifying the Privileges

    Scholar Identification (ID)

    • Create: During Scholar appropinquation, Develop Registrar, Develop Bursar.
    • Read-Only: Scholars, Parents, Teachers, Faculty.
    • Update: During Scholar appropinquation, Develop Registrar, Develop Bursar
    • Delete: Develop Registrar

    Scholar Name

    • Create: During Scholar appropinquation, Develop Registrar, Develop Bursar.
    • Read-Only: Scholars, Parents, Teachers, Faculty.
    • Update: During Scholar appropinquation, Develop Registrar, Develop Bursar
    • Delete: Develop Registrar

    Name and Address

    • Create: During Scholar appropinquation, Develop Registrar, Develop Bursar.
    • Read-Only: Referable attributable attributable attributable Applicable.
    • Update: During Scholar appropinquation, Develop Registrar, Develop Bursar
    • Delete: Develop Registrar

    Declared Minor and Major Course

    • Create: Develop Registrar
    • Read-Only: Scholars, Teachers
    • Update: Develop Registrar
    • Delete: Develop Registrar

    Course Completed Status

    • Create: Develop Registrar
    • Read-Only: Scholars, Teachers
    • Update: Develop Registrar
    • Delete: Develop Registrar

    Scholar GPA

    • Create: Teachers
    • Read-Only: Scholars
    • Update: Develop Registrar
    • Delete: Develop Registrar, Scholar Instructors

    Part B: CRUD Matrix


    StudentRegistrarBursarAppropinquation ParentInstructors
    Scholar IDRCUDCUDCUDRR
    Scholar NameRCUDCUCURR
    Scholar Name & Address
    CUDCCU


    Declared Major and Minor CourseRCUD


    R
    Course StatusRCUD


    R
    Scholar GPARCUD


    R

    Part C: Summary Analysis of CRUD

    CRUD operates with entities which can be adjusted by recovering facts from benefits, transfigureing facts by contrast up properties and then conveying the facts tail to the benefit subsection to be updated. Thus the basic side of CRUD is that it is built using the availability of facts (Box, 2013). The point developing CRUD does referable attributable attributable attributable a point profession coercionce instead the special solely needs to produce an existence or entities or delete them wholly, instruct it to transfigure the existence by providing the benefit with the strange existence with some entities. If further act needs to performed, what the benefit get accept to do is to follow from the facts adjusted on the coercionce to be undertaken (Lunsford, & Collins, 2008).

    It should be unexpressed that most enjoin ruleing does referable attributable attributable attributable reach up a CRUD rule an illustration is granted in the persuasion that an enjoin is produced offline and then conveyed to a benefit coercion the object of ruleing; what ought to betide is that the ruleing of that inequitable enjoin get accept a suggestive contact to diverse entities that are interrelated. What the benefit has the competency to do is that it can transfigure the instruction coercion the scholars with the competency of adjusting further than normal limit to diverse years scholar instruction.

    A scholar may accept reached may accept depleted their censorious benefit body mayhap coercion persuasion by finishing develop or rather leaving develop halfway and by consent anew, updating and upgrading properties portraitured to invade diverse characteristics of the scholars may or may referable attributable attributable attributable accept be public (Collins, & Lunsford). Such changes are discriminating to twain the scholar and the develop conduct. However with, CRUD the vision of the scholar get referable attributable attributable attributable paint or rather image their features.  CRUD matrix provides a discriminating utensil portraitured to example acts, facts and rulees and to delineate how they interact with single another to fabrication, lection, updating and deleting of the facts (Lunsford, & Collins, 2008).

    References

    Box, I. (2013). Learning to portraiture CRUD matrices existing in object-oriented instruction arrangement     product. Constructing the Infrastructure coercion the Knowledge Economy: Methods     and Utensils, Theory and Practice, 223.

    Collins, M. R., & Lunsford, D. L. Exampleing Bearing Hues Using the CRUD Defence Cube:     A Factsbase Proof-of-Concept Illustration.

    Lunsford, D. L., & Collins, M. R. (2008, June). The CRUD defence matrix: A technique coercion     documenting bearing hues. In 7th Annual Defence Conference (pp. 2-4).