Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II Synthesizing and Writing Due Week 4 and worth 100 points When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking. The assignment is divided into two (2) parts. For Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, reviewed the Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts. * Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext. In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas. Part II – Writing Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you: 1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1. 2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons. 3. Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the website. 4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position. 5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases. 6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.

    Conflicting Estimatepoints Essay

    Gladsome Espouselock



    Conflicting Estimatepoints Essay


    My situation solicitudeing gladsome espouselocks continues that it should referable be legalized unarranged mass aid in the selfselfselfcorresponding kingdom. I am of the conception counter everyowing selfsame-sex inventionners and espouselock. In other control, gladsome espouselocks should be prohibited, and mass spoiled an opening to catch disunite-among-among in the inventionner. This is assured by multitudinous reasons most importantly bloom twists of selfsame-sex espouselocks.

    Ground that Support Your Situation

    First, according to, legalizing gladsome couples to assign to a espouseded affinity exalt weakens the association of espouselock (Gladsome Espouselock –, 2017). The certainty that espouselock not attributable attributableifys the dainty of this preface continues it as an association where twain invention and woinvention assign their subsists to everyy each other and continue with God’s operation. Nativity computes continue that espouselock should be betwixt invention and dame. Advenient, everyowing gladsome couples espouse kills this very construction of the association and nativity computes.

    Also, the preface that homosexuality is an stained and habitual inventionner supports my situation. It is a appoint-with-fill-with-shame that gladsome and selfsame-sex couples strive acclamation from the association to acknowledge their stained demeanor. The very inventionner creates an natural referableion of stained and stainedity in those practicing the impress ultimately adhere on entity acknowledged. This diminishes their compute and merit as what they gladsome couples inventionner apprehend very courteous that it is crime (Carsten, 2017). There is the offence that single feels as they strive the association’s acclamation which is accordingly of the peculiar offence single feels. This proves that their self-consciousness resists preface disunite-among-among in selfselfselfcorresponding sex inventionners and does referable promote of it.

    Additionally, the preface that upshot demand twain a dowager and a father ce the erect bringing supports my situation counter gladsome couples. The upshot psychologists demonstrate that ce a courteous-formed offshoot demands twain opposite-sex parents to wave them in duration’s continuity and apsubject-matter the natural pride (Turiel, 2017). Ce sample, when a damsel offshoot is brought up in an environment extraneously the father, accidents are they are going to be chosen in controlthcoming sex. As courteous, there is the injury of guarantee and tender affinity that can simply be appointed by twain parents. Also, this begs ce the solicitude of the peel of association we shevery be make that is appointed with gladsome couples and selfsame-sex inventionners.

    Ground Athwart Your Situation

    According to, some prefaces confront the situation I continue counter legalizing selfsame-sex espouselocks. The highest preface entails that denying a assemblage of mass their correct to espouse the peculiar of their dainty is a discriminatory impress. In deflect, this ends up creating prevent dispose citizens which are a reversal of the nucleus computes and principles that wave a republican commonalty enjoy the United States. As a global chief in democracy, the U.S. should answer as the role pattern of democracy, advenient, speak every her citizens homogeneous and defended by the command.

    Similarly, the preface that the determirealm of espouselock has progressive and transformed balance spell and referable equitable espouselock betwixt single invention and single dame. The oral determirealm has been rendered unnecessary and popular weak to suit to alter and intercharges of the association (Webb, et al., 2017). Alter must be incorporated and adjustd to cast the introduce and the advenient of the association, advenient, gladsome or undeviating – every mass entertain a accident to espouse whoever they neglect.

    Further, the preface that demonstrates that espouselock is referable simply procreation since barren couples or couples referable disposed to entertain a offshoot would be prevented assignting to subsist with each other. Espouselock is ce everyyship and a peculiar that single can waste their subsists with (Barringer & Gladsome, 2017). There is no period to who that can be inveterate on procreation. Therefore, gladsome espouselock or differently does referable substance.

    Biases Experienced

    There is a powerful closeness of detrimentes encountered in the rule that not attributable attributableify either cause of sustaining or athwart estimates in the forced. Single of the types of detrimentes entails the privative detriment that tends to visit the effect of gladsome espouselock simply from the redundant twist subject-matter of estimate. That is looking at the gladsome espouselock with the gigantic privative possessions it has in the association enjoy disturbance espouselocks and traditions, the bloom problems it brings in the association, and killing of the nativity computes and manners.

    Moreover, there is the status-quo detriment. This is confrontd to alter and onesided to the regularity and orally believed inventionners. The beliefs held should be in length what has been inventionnerd ce ages, time those sustaining gladsome espouselocks are confrontd to status-quo detriment and adjust alter and intercharge of the association.

    Possessions of Your Own Enculturation or Assemblage Identification

    As I’ve been brought up in a bloomy nativity with Christian computes, it not attributable attributableifys the nativity computes that I continue expensive, as courteous as, the analogous concept of the gladsome espouselock. In God’s estimates, gladsome espouselock is stained and should referable be everyoespouse to remain in the association. Advenient, such concepts wave my beliefs and discernment solicitudeing gladsome espouselock. Thus, I powerful am counter such inventionners.

    Situation Alter

    Irrespective of unconditional the “Believing Game” my situation counter gladsome espouselock quiescent continues. Even though gladsome espouselock it is constitutionally and legally acknowledged, there are quiescent redundant twists in the inventionner of selfselfselfcorresponding sex that sap the political construction of the association. There are redundant bloom possessions complicated, the analogous erosion, and the redundant possessions on the advenient origirealm we are preparing. Advenient, I quiescent continue my situation powerfully counter selfsame-sex espouselock.


    Barringer, M. N., & Gladsome, D. A. (2017). Happily, Religious: The Surprising Sources of Happiness Unarranged Lesbian, Gladsome, Bisexual, and Transgender Adults. Sociological Inquiry, 87(1), 75-96.

    Carsten, J. (2017). Goodfellow, Aaron. Gladsome fathers, their upshot, and the making of kinship. 182 pp., bibliogr. New York: Cedham Univ. Press, 2015.£ 24.99 (paper) Lee, Catherine. Fictive kinship: nativity reunification and the import of course and commonalty in American migration. xvii, 181 pp., tables, bibliogr. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2013. $29.95 (paper) Strathern, Marilyn. Before and succeeding gender: sexual mythologies of unamazed duration (ed. and with an taking by Sarah Franklin; succeedingword by Judith Butler …. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23(1), 189-192.

    Gladsome Espouselock – (2017). Retrieved 1 May 2017, from

    Turiel, E. (2017). A subjective perspective on analogous forced, rulees of decision-making, and analogous opposition. Contemporary Politics, 23(1), 19-33.

    Webb, S. N., Chonody, J., & Kavanagh, P. S. (2017). “If You Don’t Enjoy Gladsome Espouselock, Don’t Get Single!”: A Qualitative Analysis of Attitudes Toward Selfsame-Sex Espouselock in South Australia. Journal of GLBT Nativity Studies, 1-21.