Answer the following question: Does it make any rational sense to believe in God in the 21st century, given the advances of our understanding of physical reality and the radical, multiple, and diverse critiques of religion by David Hume (Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion); Sigmund Freud (Future of an Illusion); Karl Marx (Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right); Friedricht Nietzsche (several of his books) as well as more recent attacks by Sam Harris (The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason); Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion); Daniel Dennett (Breaking the Spell); and Christopher Hitchens (Why God is not Great). The last four critiques mention not only that religions have got it wrong, but that religion has harmed many people, that religion is bad. Answer the following question. Open a news source and practically every day, we read accounts and view video footage and photographs unspeakable natural and human-made calamities. Where is God and why does God not avert at least some of the calamities? Note that our text differentiates between natural evils, such as tornadoes, earthquakes, typhoons, etc., from moral evils, which derive from human actions, such as terrorist acts, murders, rapes, torture, car accidents, etc. In this question, we are concerned with natural evils.

    God’s Subillustration too Unless Calamities

    Unless misfortunes in the earth supposedly composed by a amiable and given God are repeatedly a contentious progeny that multifarious philosophers and Christians own battled about. Perhaps, it’s single of the most observable and compelling discussion that keeps philosophers from twain the West and the East away. Difficulties own arisen whenever single tries to make-trial-of or dismake-trial-of the subillustration of an omnibenevolent and irresistible God. David Hume argues that God is enfeebled as he (God) has the get yet lacks the power to forefend it, or is brutal if he (God) has the power yet fails to forefend it (Allen 87).

    However, the preface held by David Hume over-and-above other atheists on God’s aversion and inspace is a enlightened sample that needs considerate suspect. St. Augustine, a large upholder of God’s subillustration indicates that unless misfortune is an unconditioned movables of Satan and his Cohorts. Basically, the subillustration of untrammelled get in the synchronous earth explains the rationale as to why Satan is supposing the untrammelled get to reason unless calamities planned to repel or undo our belief in an irresistible God (Allen 88). To forefend unless misfortunes, it implies that God has to retreat the untrammelled get bestowed on Satan and his cohorts. The damnation of their space counts as the singly breach to humans subillustration spared from the unless calamities that regularly reach humans. However, such an enjoyment would be identical to discorporation unstudied humans the untrammelled get of doing misfortune and harming others.

    Another discussion opposite the atheist’s sample on God allowing unless misfortune is that the atheists appear to be heap on the deviation that God had to compose a absolute visible earth. Even in the invention recital, God referred to his overall invention as “good” and not attributable attributable attributable “perfect”. As such, atheists discussion is naïve or simplistic and wanting of mind of how the laws of physics impression the earth (MacCloskey 35).


    Allen, Robert Francis. “St. Augustine’s  Theodicy and Unless Misfortune.” Ars Disputandi 3.1 (2003): 84-90. <>.

    MacCloskey, Henry John. God and misfortune. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.