1. Briefly describe what happens in each of the six project management process groups (initiating, planning, executing, monitoring, controlling, and closing). On which process should the project manager spend the most time? Which process groups would spend the most and the least amount of time? 2. Why is it helpful for a business to follow a project management methodology? 3. Describe the purpose of a business case and its main contents. 4. Discuss the role of the key stakeholders for the project kick-off meeting. Who should attend? What key topics should be on the agenda? 5. Review the Just-In-Time case study in this chapter and identify at least two critical areas of the example project charter that you feel needs further explanation and identify at least one key item you feel should have been included. Create a new project charter with your updates.

    Ans 1. Project administration regularity groups speed from initiating activities to contemplationning activities, executing activities, mentoring and controlcible activities, and noncommunication activities. Initiating processes grasp defining and authorizing a theory or theory face. Initiating regularityes admit situate during each phase

    of a theory. Therefore, you canreferable equate regularity assemblages with theory faces. Recfull that there can be unanalogous theory faces, but full theorys complete grasp full five regularity assemblages. Coercion in, theory supervisors and teams should alter the calling demand coercion the theory during full face of the

    theory career cycle to separateize if the theory is worth continuing. Initiating regularityes are to-boot demandd to purpose a project. Someone must initiate activities to determine that the theory team completes full the effect, documents nearons skilled, assigns theory instrument, and that the customer accepts the work.

    Planning regularityes grasp devising and maintaining a effectable theory to determine that the theory addresses the structure s demands. There are different contemplations coercion theorys, such as the design administration contemplation, list administration contemplation, cost administration contemplation, contrivement administration contemplation, and so on, defining each understanding area as it relates to the theory at that top in time. Coercion in, a theory team must unravel a contemplation to eliminate the effect that demands to be executed coercion the theory, to list activities cognate to that effect, to consider costs coercion accomplishing the effect, to decide what instrument to contrive to complete the effect, and so on. To recital coercion changing conditions

    on the theory and in the structure, theory teams repeatedly revise contemplations during each face of the theory career cycle.

    Executing regularityes grasp coordinating people and other instrument to heave quenched the diverse contemplations and consequence the products, services, or results of the theory or face. Ins of executing regularityes grasp acquiring and unraveling the theory team, accomplishing temper assertion, distributing referableice,

    managing stakeholder expectations, and conducting procurements.

    Monitoring and controlcible regularityes grasp regularly measuring and mentoring speed to determine that the theory team meets the theory objectives. The theory supervisor and staff mentor and mete speed despite the contemplations and admit corrective renewal when indispensable. A sordid mentoring

    and controlcible regularity is reporting exertion, where theory stakeholders can establish any indispensable changes that may be required to sustain the theory on vestige.

    Noncommunication regularityes grasp coercionmalizing acceptance of the theory or theory face and purposeing it efficiently. Administrative activities are repeatedly complicated in this regularity assemblage, such as archiving theory files, noncommunication quenched contracts, documenting nearons skilled, and receiving coercionmal acceptance of the surrendered effect as sever of the face or theory. The regularity assemblages are referable mutually esoteric. Coercion in, theory managers must accomplish mentoring and controlcible regularityes throughquenched the theory s career two.

    The regularity assemblages are referable mutually esoteric. Coercion example, theory supervisors must

    accomplish mentoring and controlcible regularityes throughout the theory s career two. The

    flatten of principle and protraction of each regularity assemblage varies coercion full theory. Normally, executing tasks demands the most instrument and age, followed by contemplationning tasks.

    Initiating and noncommunication tasks are usually the shortest (at the inauguration and purpose of a

    theory or face, respectively), and they demand the least total of instrument and age.

    However, full theory is singular, so there can be exceptions. You can adduce the regularity

    groups coercion each elder face of a theory, or you can adduce the regularity assemblages to

    an full theory.

    Ans 2 . Theory Administration methodologies evolved from a near compound substance of smaller, over easily controlled theorys. However, introduce day theorys are repeatedly liberalr and over compound and include significantly important promote. The entanglement associated with managing such theorys is considerably important than the compoundity of the separate severs.

    The Theory Administration Methodology enables the surrendery structure to decorations these theorys comprehensively, systematically, and in an integrated habit coercion exquisite promote. Because of this, it provides benefits at the strategic, tactical and operational flattens.

    Strategic Benefit

    Strategically, the methodology is indispensable to provide faith to customers, severners and greater administration that the offer structure can conduct liberal theorys and surrender them profitably. The methodology enables the surrendery structure to realistically assess the promotes and difficulties that liberal theorys encompass and deposit in situate the strategies demanded to minimize and overcome them.

    Tactical Benefit

    At the tactical flatten, the methodology fullows off-site supervisors to possess faith in the sinew of standing assessments. It ensures forthcoming remembrance and chastisement of problems, whether these are technical, cognate to the calling demandments, or to the calling condition.

    Operational Benefit

    At the operational flatten, the methodology is the explanation resources by which the surrendery structure empowers the theory team to do the fair man, the fair habit, the original age. This is regulative to enable the surrendery structure to surrender cost-effective, schedule-compressed solutions.